<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Councilmember Gordon says state police need to review contract deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hamtramckreview.com/2010/02/councilmember-gordon-says-state-police-need-to-review-contract-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hamtramckreview.com/2010/02/councilmember-gordon-says-state-police-need-to-review-contract-deal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.hamtramckreview.com/2010/02/councilmember-gordon-says-state-police-need-to-review-contract-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-14110</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamtramckreview.com/?p=1404#comment-14110</guid>
		<description>Regarding this story and quotes from the councilmeeeting:

please oh please dont tell me that we as a city are going to pay tens of thousands in legal fees again to investigate a council member. the whole fiasco regarding Gordon was a waste of thousands of our dollars and hers just to find that she was in the clear. admittedly if there is a definitive wrongdoing, then by all means correct the situation, but dont go trigger happy. 

&quot; ...the cost per cut on this contract was 3 times as high as Platinum&#039;s, but the grant was for creating season work for homeless, unemployed people and not merely to mow grass.&quot;

So in a state of budget shortages its ok to mindlessly spend taxpayer money as long as its for a good cause? gee why not send our entire budget to Haiti, i&#039;m sure they could use our $16million to help rebuild. thats the most good we can afford and we&#039;ll probably get a nice plaque for the City Hall before its sold and probably a nice tax deduction too.

Home comes first. Helping the homeless and poor and creating jobs is a good thing to do but seriously, the logic of this setup escapes me, if you pay them $8 an hour minimum you should be able to get the same amount of work for less than half the cost of paying a service company, so what are they doing hiring 15 people to cut one lawn? why not hire 3 to do the work and pay 12 to stay out of the way, same results! please explain this as i am SURE i am misreading this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding this story and quotes from the councilmeeeting:</p>
<p>please oh please dont tell me that we as a city are going to pay tens of thousands in legal fees again to investigate a council member. the whole fiasco regarding Gordon was a waste of thousands of our dollars and hers just to find that she was in the clear. admittedly if there is a definitive wrongdoing, then by all means correct the situation, but dont go trigger happy. </p>
<p>&#8221; &#8230;the cost per cut on this contract was 3 times as high as Platinum&#8217;s, but the grant was for creating season work for homeless, unemployed people and not merely to mow grass.&#8221;</p>
<p>So in a state of budget shortages its ok to mindlessly spend taxpayer money as long as its for a good cause? gee why not send our entire budget to Haiti, i&#8217;m sure they could use our $16million to help rebuild. thats the most good we can afford and we&#8217;ll probably get a nice plaque for the City Hall before its sold and probably a nice tax deduction too.</p>
<p>Home comes first. Helping the homeless and poor and creating jobs is a good thing to do but seriously, the logic of this setup escapes me, if you pay them $8 an hour minimum you should be able to get the same amount of work for less than half the cost of paying a service company, so what are they doing hiring 15 people to cut one lawn? why not hire 3 to do the work and pay 12 to stay out of the way, same results! please explain this as i am SURE i am misreading this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
